Manavadan, son of Kuttimbatti Thamburatti – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Manavadan – Respondent
Menon, J.
1. This is an appeal against the order of Pandrang Row, J. in A.A.O. No. 70 of 1936 confirming the order of the Subordinate Judge of South Malabar at Calicut dismissing an application for the appointment of an interim Receiver pending disposal of O.S. No. 29 of 1935. The suit is by a junior member of Petinharakettu Tavazhi of Pudia Kovilagam for the removal of the managers of the tavazhi appointed under a karar of 1914. Pending the suit this application was made for the appointment of a Receiver for the management of the properties of the tavazhi. The learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the application, holding that it was not competent for the Court to appoint an interim Receiver in a case of this kind. Our learned brother, Pandrang Row, J., differed from the learned Subordinate Judge in his opinion on this point and held that it was open to the Court, when circumstances require, to appoint an interim Receiver in oases of this kind. We agree with our learned brother in his opinion that, in suits for the removal of a karnavan or a manager appointed under a family karar, a Receiver can be appointed during the pendency of the suit if a proper case is made out. The qu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.