SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1936 Supreme(Mad) 158

PANDRANG ROW
Ganesh Naidu – Appellant
Versus
C. Mallaram Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Pandrang Row, J.

1. This is an appeal from the decree of the City Civil Judge, Madras, dated February 2, 1935, in O.S. No. 783 of 1934, a suit for ejecting the defendants and for recovery of possession of the plaint property. According to the plaintiff the site on which the plaint superstructure stands, belonged to one Abdul Huq and the defendants were the tenants of the site who had put up the suit superstructure thereon and were paying a rent of Re. 1-13-0 per month. The plaintiff purchased the site from Abdul Huq on October 15, 1934. Some months earlier in execution of a decree of the Small Cause Court, the superstructure belonging to the defendants had been sold and purchased by the plaintiff himself on May 5, 1934. The plaintiff, therefore, claimed to be the owner of the house as well as the site and on the strength of. this title to the house and the site he claimed to recover possession of both. The superstructure was purchased by the plaintiff on May. 5, 1934, and immediately thereafter, on the strength of this purchase, in Court auction, of the superstructure, he instituted a suit for ejecting the defendants, namely, O.S. No. 346 of 1934 In that suit the lower Court





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top