SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Mad) 67

VARADACHARIAR
Appellants: The Board of Commissioner for the Hindu Religious Endowments – Appellant
Versus
Respondent: Pidugu Narasimham – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Varadachariar, J.

1. This is an appeal by the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Board against a decree setting aside a scheme framed by the Hoard for the administration of an institution known as "Sri Virlu Alaya" in Karampudi village, within the jurisdiction of the Guruzala District Munsifs Court. The Board framed a scheme on the footing that the institution was a "temple" within the meaning of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act. The plaintiff, who sometimes called himself the Dharmakartha of the institution, instituted the suit for a declaration that the institution, was not a temple within the meaning of the Act and that therefore the Board had no jurisdiction to frame a scheme in respect of its administration. The learned District Judge held that the worship carried on in the place was merely hero-worship and not religious worship and that the institution, was not therefore a "temple" within the meaning of the Act. Hence this appeal.

2. Though the parties have differed as to the significance of certain events described in the course of the evidence and as to the description of certain parts of the structure of the building wherein the objects of the worship are loc




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top