SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Mad) 348

BURN
S. P. Perumal Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
M. K. Kondal Chetty – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Burn, J.

1. The appellant is the owner of 1/34, Selva Vinayakar Koil Street, Old Washermanpet, Madras. This house is the superstructure upon a site belonging to the respondents, and the appellant pays ground rent to the respondents. The respondents applied by a petition under Section 7 of the Madras City Tenants Protection Act (Madras Act III of 1922) to the City Civil Court to fix a reasonable rent for the occupation of the land on which the appellants house is built. The ground rent previously paid was Rs. 7 per1 month. The learned Principal Judge of the City Civil Court heard the application, came to the conclusion that a reasonable rent would be Rs. 7-12-0 and fixed the rent at that figure. This is Within the limit fixed by the proviso to Section 7 of the Act. The proviso is:

That the rent previously payable for the land shall not be enhanced by more than two annas in the rupee.

2. The appellant has filed this appeal purporting to be under Section 15 of the City Civil Court Act read with Section 96 bf the Civil Procedure Code.

3. Learned Counsel for the respondents has taken a preliminary objection that the order passed by the learned Principal Judge of the City Civil Court






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top