SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Mad) 408

VENKATARAMANA RAO
Narayanaswami Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Ramaswami Nayak, son of Narayanappa Nayak – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Venkataramana Rao, J.

1. This second appeal raises a question as to the validity of a deposit under Section 83 of the Transfer of Property Act before it was amended by Act XX of 1929 and Act V of 1930. On 13th April, 1919, the first defendant executed a mortgage in favour of one Sankaranarayanaswami Nayak the plaintiffs predecessor-in-title for a sum of Rs. 1,350. The mortgage deed provided thus:

To this sum of Rs. 1,350, I shall add interest at the rate of Re. 0-14-0 per cent, per mensem and pay the amount of principal and interest due thus on 11th April, 1920 and duly redeem this bond. In default, to the amount of principal and interest accruing due till then, interest shall for the remaining periods be added at the rate of Re. 1-6-0 per cent, per mensem, and re the total of principal and interest, the interest accruing so due once in twelve months shall be added on to the principal, and you shall, whenever required, recover the amounts thus accruing due, along with interest at the said rate of Re. 1-6-0...

2. Subsequent to the date of the mortgage the first defendant sold in the same year the said property which comprised eight items to his wife the fifth defendant. On the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top