SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Mad) 399

VARADACHARIAR
Ninkileri Lakshmikutty Kettilamma – Appellant
Versus
Thekka Madathi Vishnu Nambisan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Varadachariar, J.

1. The only question for decision in this Miscellaneous Appeal is whether certain insurance policy amount which has been sought to be attached by the respondent decree-holder can be held to be "assets" of the late Kerala Varma Raja in the hands of the appellant.

2. The appellant is the widow of Kerala Varma Raja. The policy in question was an endowment policy obtained by the deceased in 1927 and was payable on the 5th April, 1952, or on the death of the assured earlier. On the 3rd July, 1933, the assured assigned this policy by an endorsement on the policy itself. This assignment was duly communicated to the insurance company and there registered, though as usual the company guarded itself from admitting the validity of the assignment. The assured died in 1933 and the decree under execution was passed against the appellant as his legal representative. The question does not now arise between the company and the assignee but between the assignee and a person who has obtained a decree against the assets of the assured.

3. The Court of first instance released the policy amount from attachment on the ground that by reason of the assignment the policy amount belong







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top