SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Mad) 189

BURN
Gooru Narayana – Appellant
Versus
Vaikuntam Chinna Lakshmayya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Burn, J.

1. The learned District Judge ought, I think, to have summoned the witnesses, since the petitioners objected to the statements of the Reddi and the Karnam. Affidavits cannot properly be acted upon unless both parties agree to have them treated as evidence. The order will be set aside and the petition restored to file for disposal according to law as provided for in Order 33 of the Civil Procedure Code. The costs of this petition will abide and follow the result.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top