Pandrang Row, J.

1. These revision cases arise out of an order passed by the Joint Magistrate of Narsapur Division on the 17th June, 1937, under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code, regarding a dispute about a large extent of land which was till recently jungle or waste but has since been included in an irrigation project and has consequently increased in value. The dispute was between the Zamindar of Gazzavaram and Kalipatnam Estates and Mr. Addepalli Venkataraman, the first respondent in the Court below, who describes himself as a Barrister of the Inns of Court at Dublin and an Advocate of this Court and others who claim under the first respondent. The first respondent himself claimed the land in dispute under a document which according to him is a perpetual lease executed in his favour by the petitioner Zamindar in 1923. The Magistrate found that actual possession was with the petitioner, and passed orders declaring that the petitioner is in possession and forbidding all disturbance of such possession by the other party. The first respondent is the petitioner in Criminal Revision Case No. 383 of 1937 and the third respondent who claims under him as a tenant is the pet