SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Mad) 292

BURN
Minor Jali Basappa by next friend Nagamma – Appellant
Versus
Heerada Rudrappa – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Burn, J.

1. There is no authority for the contention that an attachment before judgment which has come to an end with the dismissal of the suit, is restored when the suit is restored to file, in spite of an alienation of the property in the meanwhile. The case of Saranatha Aiyangar v. Muthiah Mooppanar (1933)65MLJ844 , cited by the learned Advocate for the appellant is expressly against him on this point.

2. This appeal is accordingly dismissed with costs (one set between the two respondents).

3. Leave refused.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top