SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Mad) 369

WADSWORTH
Subramania Gurukkal – Appellant
Versus
Abhinava Poornapriya A. Srinivasa Rao Sahib – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Wadsworth, J.

1. The appellant who was the defendant in trial Court is an arehaka in possession of lands alleged to belong to a temple in a village situated within the Ami estate. On 27th January 1932 the Court of Wards which was then in charge of the estate dismissed the defendant from his office of arehaka on the ground that he had failed to render service and had failed to give any explanation to the charges connected with his default. After the dismissal the suit was filed by the Jagirdar represented by his next friend the manager of the estate under the Court of Wards as trustee of the temple to recover possession of the lands connected with the arehaka service. Certain dates are of importance. The late jagirdar of Arni died on 25th June 1931. The order of dismissal of the defendant was passed on 27th January 1932. The suit was filed on 22nd April 1932; and on 23rd November 1932 after the suit had been filed but before it was decreed there was a notification making the new jagirdar a ward under the Court. It is common ground that in the interim between the death of the old jagirdar and this notification the Court of Wards continued in charge of the estate. In the trial







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top