SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1938 Supreme(Mad) 297

VENKATARAMANA RAO
Koraprolu Veerabhadrayya – Appellant
Versus
Jajala Seethamma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Venkataramana Rao, J.

1. This second appeal arises out of a suit in ejectment instituted by the plaintiff to recover a sixth share of the properties alleged to have been left by her maternal grandmother one Chinna Sub-bamma. The said Chinna Subbamma was the daughter of one I. Veeravadhanulu. The properties in suit are described in Schedules A and B to the plaint. The basis o the plaintiffs claim is that under a deed Ex. A dated 2nd October 1887, the said Veeravadhanulu gifted the said properties absolutely to his daughter, the said Chinna Subbamma, that Chinna Subbamma had two daughters, the mother of the plaintiff and defendants 4 and 5, and the mother of defendants 2 and 3, and both the daughters predeceased her, that Chinna Subbamma. died in 1922, that on her death the plaintiff and defendants 2 to 5, as the daughters, daughters of the said Ghinna Subbamma; have become entitled to the said property and that the plaintiff is entitled to a one-sixth share therein being a third of the half-shares which the plaintiff and defendants 4 and 5 would get in right of their mother, defendants 2 and 3 being entitled to the remaining half-share. It was alleged in the plaint that defen









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top