SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1940 Supreme(Mad) 294

WADSWORTH
Kolathoor Soolapani Moopil variar – Appellant
Versus
Vayanakare Thekke Veettil Veloor alias Amminikat Mele Veettil alias Etachole Kunhihileshmi alias Kunhimalu Amma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Wadsworth, J.

1. The petitioner here was the plaintiff in a suit to redeem a Malabar kanom. An application was filed in that suit by the ninth defendant for relief under Section 15 of Madras Act IV of 1938. That application was granted and it is this order that the plaintiff-petitioner seeks to revise.

2. The kanom in question was executed on 23rd March, 1915, and it contained a provision that in case of default of payment of rent to the jenmi, the latter could adjust the arrears of rent due with interest thereon to the kanom amount. There was a default and on 10th September, 1934, the plaintiff filed a suit for redemption appropriating the arrears towards the amount which was due under the kanom and claiming to redeem the kanom on payment of the balance Rs. 715 and odd. At the time of this suit, the kanom right was held by the tarwad of the defendants which admittedly paid more than Rs. 500 as land revenue and was therefore not an agriculturist, having regard to the Proviso D to Section 3(ii) of Act IV of 1938. On 5th July, 1935, there was a partition in the defendants tarwad and at this partition the kanom right in question was assigned to the tavazhi represented by the nin


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top