SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1940 Supreme(Mad) 302

ALFRED HENRY LIONEL LEACH
Chinatalapati Venkatanarasimharaju now major – Appellant
Versus
Surisetti Ramaswami – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.

1. The question which has been referred reads as follows:

Whether a person who is in the enjoyment of an easement, but who has not acquired a title to it by prescription or otherwise, can maintain an action to prevent its obstruction by any person other than the owner of the servient tenement?

2. The considerations which may apply when the interference complained of has reference to the access of light and air or to support from adjoining land may not apply when the interference has reference to the use of a way over anothers land and as this reference arises out of a case relating to an alleged right of way we consider that the question should be re-framed in these terms:

Can a person who has been using a particular way over land adjoining his, but for less than the prescriptive period, maintain an action to prevent a stranger from obstructing him using the way?

3. In Jootoor Acchanna v. Kanamala Venkatamma (1895)5MLJ24 , a Bench of this Court (Collins, C. J., and Parker, J.) held that a plaintiff who had received light through a window opening on vacant ground, but had not enjoyed the light sufficiently long to acquire an easement, was entitled




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top