SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1940 Supreme(Mad) 522

LAKSHMANA RAO
Sheku Sahib – Appellant
Versus
Venkatararamanayya – Respondent


ORDER

Lakshmana Rao, J.

1. The property was attached by the amin in execution of a decree at the instance of the petitioner and the fact that the claim petition of the complainant was allowed does not warrant the conviction of the petitioner under Section 879 read with Section 114, Penal Code. The conviction is therefore set aside and the fine if levied will be refunded.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top