SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1940 Supreme(Mad) 497

ALFRED HENRY LIONEL LEACH
Kausalai Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Sankaramuthiah Pillai – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.

1. The appellant is the widow of a person who was a member of a joint Hindu family. Her husband died some time before 1926, but the actual date does not appear in the record. On the 18th October, 1926, the appellant filed a suit to recover from Murugesam Pillai, the surviving member of the joint Hindu family, money by way of maintenance. She succeeded and the Court made the sums awarded to her under the decree a charge on certain immovable properties. On the 25th July, 1926, Murugesam Pillai mortgaged these properties to the respondent, who in 1931 filed in the Court of the District -Munsif of Cuddalore the suit out of which this appeal arises to enforce the mortgage. The appellant was made a party and she pleaded that her charge for maintenance took priority of the respondents mortgage. The District Munsif and the Subordinate Judge of Cuddalore on appeal upheld the appellants contention, but the respondent appealed to this Court and Krishnaswami Aiyangar, J., allowed his appeal. This appeal has been filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, Krishnaswami Aiyangar, J., having given the necessary certificate.

2. Stated shortly the appellant ca









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top