HAPPELL
Happell, J.
1. The petitioner has been convicted by the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate of an offence under the Motor Vehicles Act and has been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 50. The facts as proved are that a motor car owned by the petitioner was twice used, on the 1st of July and a week before, for taking bundles of newspapers from the office of the Indian Express to the railway station. Section 42(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act prohibits the use of a transport vehicle save in accordance with the conditions of a permit and Section 123 provides the punishment for an offence in contravention of Section 42(1). A goods vehicle is by definition a transport vehicle [Section 2(34) of the Motor Vehicles Act]; and "goods vehicle " is defined in Section 2(8) as follows:
goods vehicle means any motor vehicle constructed or adapted for use for the carriage of goods or any motor vehicle not so constructed or adapted when used for the carriage of goods solely or in addition to passengers. The petitioner held no permit for the use of the motor car as a transport vehicle, and accordingly if the motor car was a "goods vehicle " as defined in Section 2(8) by reason of the fact that it was use
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.