SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Mad) 212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.
The Crown Prosecutor
Versus
V.R. Ramanatha Aiyar
Decided On : 26.07.1945

The material used for cooking sweetmeat is not considered an ingredient of the sweetmeat.

Headnote:

Adulteration - Ingredients - Definition of 'ingredient' in the context of sweetmeat preparation

Fact of the Case:

The respondent, proprietor of a restaurant, was charged with adulteration for not displaying a notice regarding the use of ghee in sweetmeat preparation. The Chief Presidency Magistrate acquitted the respondent, stating that the material used for cooking sweetmeat is not an ingredient.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the material used for cooking sweetmeat is not an ingredient, and upheld the acquittal of the respondent.

Issues: Interpretation of the definition of 'ingredient' in the context of sweetmeat preparation and the requirement to display notices regarding the use of ghee in food preparation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the definition of 'ingredient' and concluded that the material used for cooking sweetmeat is not considered an ingredient of the sweetmeat.

Final Decision: The appeal by the Provincial Government was dismissed, and the acquittal of the respondent was upheld.

JUDGMENT

Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.

1. This is an appeal by the Provincial Government against the acquittal by the Chief Presidency Magistrate of the respondent on a charge framed under Rule 28-B of the Madras Prevention of Adulteration Rules, 1932, framed under the Prevention of Adulteration Act. The respondent is the Proprietor of a restaurant known as "The Ramakrishna Lunch Home" in China Bazar Road, Madras. He makes and sells a sweetmeat called jangiri. The ingredients of jangiri are blackgram, rice and sugar. The sweetmeat is generally made by frying the ingredients in ghee. It is said that in some hotels oil is used for this purpose. On the 25th February, 1944, a Food Inspector visited the respondents restaurant and purchased a quantity of jangiri which was then being offered for sale. He had a sample analysed by the Public Analyst of the Corporation of Madras, who found that the fat used for cooking this particular jangiri consisted of 50 per cent. ghee and 50 per cent, fat not derived from milk or cream.

2. Rule 28-B says that where in a hotel, shop or other place sweetmeats, savouries or other articles of food of which ghee is commonly an ingredient are for sale and are prepared wholly or in part with a mixture referred to in Rule 28 or with oil or fat other than ghee, there shall be exhibited in the hotel, shop or other place one or more notices of such size and so placed as to be visible and clearly legible to any customer at the time of purchase that the sweetmeats, savouries, or other articles of food are not made of ghee. There was no such notice exhibited in the respondents restaurant and consequently it is said that he infringed this rule. The Chief Presidency Magistrate held that ghee or oil or other fatty substance used for frying jangiri is not an ingredient of the sweetmeat and consequently he acquitted the respondent.

3. The Chief Presidency Magistrate accepted the definition of " ingredient " as given in Chambers Dictionary, namely, that which enters into a compound; a component part of anything." One definition of the word given in the Oxford Dictionary is:

Something that enters into the formation of a compound; a component part, constituent element.

4. We agree with the Chief Presidency Magistrate that the material used for cooking jangiri is not an ingredient. The ingredients are blackgram, rice and sugar and they have to be cooked together in order to make jangiri; but this does not mean that the cooking material is part of the sweetmeat. No doubt some of the cooking material does penetrate into the jangiri but that does not make it an ingredient. If the argument advanced by the Crown Prosecutor were to he accepted, it would mean that the fat used in frying fish must be regarded as an ingredient of the fish.

5. The appeal is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top