SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Mad) 284

YAHYA ALI
Ambujammal – Appellant
Versus
Singarammal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Yahya Ali, J.

1. Seshadri Aiyangar had two sons, Rangachari and Raghavachari both of whom died issueless. Rangacharis widow is Ambujammal who is the appellant. Raghavacharis widow was Tiruvengadammal who adopted her daughters son Padmanabhachari, whose father was her son-in-law, Chakravarthi Aiyangar. Ambujammal filed O.S. No. 29 of 1921 against Tiruvengadammal and Chakravarthi, the latter for being in possession of the property belonging to the family. She claimed a half-share in the properties and she questioned the adoption. The suit was ultimately compromised. On the 22nd August, 1922, a compromise decree was passed which provided for the payment of Rs. 225 per annum to her towards maintenance, the payment to be in two instalments one in March and the other in June. The decree was being executed until O.S. No. 154 of 1935 was filed by Chakravarthi Aiyangar praying for the reduction of the maintenance amount awarded under the compromise decree. It was not precisely a reduction but it was a prayer to convert the maintenance into grain basis from cash basis which in effect led to a reduction. Chakravarthi Aiyangar succeeded to some extent as the first Court decreed that mai








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top