SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Mad) 262

YAHYA ALI
Sivalinga Pathar – Appellant
Versus
Narayani Ammal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Yahya Ali, J.

1. There were three brothers, Sivalinga, Ekambara and Chocka-linga. The last died about 12 years ago. Ekambara died on the 16th July, 1940, issueless leaving him surviving his widow. Sivalinga was the survivor. After the death of her husband, Ekambaras widow filed O.S. No. 8 of 1944 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Kumbakonam against Sivalinga as the first defendant and Chockalingas widow as the second defendant. She claimed inter alia a share in the properties other than agricultural lands by virtue of the provisions of the Hindu Womens Rights to Property Act, 1937. In his written statement, me first defendant while contesting the suit on other matters stated with reference to her claim to the division of houses and moveable properties that he had no objection to the partition of the divisible items comprised under those schedules and to the separate possession and enjoyment of a moiety of the said items by the plaintiff until her death. On the basis of this admission the plaintiff applied under Order XII, Rule 6 for a decree being passed in respect of A schedule properties and notice of the application was given. The first defendants advocate appeared






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top