SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Mad) 225

KUPPUSWAMI AYYAR
Kumariah Naicker and six Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Chinna Naicker – Respondent


ORDER

Kuppuswami Aiyar, J.

1. This is a reference by the Additional District Magistrate of Ramnad with regard to G.C No. 64 of 1945 on the file of the Additional Sub-Magistrate of Aruppukottah. Notice has been given to the complainant and he has not appeared in this Court. He filed a complaint for dacoity, theft etc., aginst the accused. That was investigated by the police and was finally thrown out under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This was on the 23rd December, 1944. On the 18th January, 1945, the complainant presented another complaint against the same accused on the same facts. The accused objected to the preferring of the complaint. The Magistrate held that the dismissal of the prior complaint under Section 203 was not a bar to the entertainment of the second complaint. The Additional District Magistrate is of the opinion that the order of the Sub-Magistrate was unsustainable as he had no jurisdiction to entertain the second complaint as the prior complaint had been dismissed and refers the case under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code-to quash the order of the Sub-Magistrate taking the complaint on file. The fact that a previous complaint was thrown out

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top