SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Mad) 334

BELLIE
Yarlagadda Venkanna – Appellant
Versus
Ramineni Kotayya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Bell, J.

1. This appeal arises out of execution proceedings following a decree passed dated 3rd March, 1932, for Rs. 2,150 being damages due from the judgment-debtor for breach of contract. A number of execution petitions were filed, the last one being disposed of on 17th December, 1943. It was dismissed on failure of the decree-holder to file certain papers. The execution petition out of which this appeal arises was filed on 22nd April, 1944, and was therefore outside the period of twelve years provided by Section 48 of the Civil Procedure Code although within three years from the date of disposal of the execution petition above-mentioned. The District Munsiff considering these facts found that the present execution petition could not be considered to be a continuation of the 1943 petition which had been plainly dismissed for default, and that, as it was outside the period of twelve years, it was time barred. He therefore dismissed it.

2. On appeal the Subordinate Judge allowed evidence to be given of fraud in the sense of Section 48(2)(a) on behalf of the decree-holder. He felt entitled to do so on the authority of Ramanathan Chettiar v. Mohideen Sahib I.L.R.(1822) All. 319








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top