SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Mad) 274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Patanjali Sastri, J.
Nemathanpatti M.M. PL. Annadhana Chatram, through its managing trustee, M.M. PL. Chokkalingam Chettiar
Versus
P.K.P.R.M. Raman Chettiar and Ors.
Decided On : 12.09.1945

The main legal point established in the judgment is that while there was no completed dedication of the property to a charitable purpose during the testator's lifetime, the property was devised under the will to the charity, and the executor was obligated to discharge the respondent's debt before carrying out the directions of the will in regard to the charity.

Headnote:

Charity - Property Dedication - Indian Succession Act - Section 333, 361 - Civil Procedure Code - Order 21, Rule 58, 63 - Suits Valuation Act - Section 11

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, as the managing trustee of a charity, sought release of a property from attachment in execution of a decree obtained by the respondent. The dispute centered around whether the property had been dedicated to a charitable purpose.

Finding of the Court:

The trial Court decreed the claim, but the lower appellate Court reversed the decree and dismissed the suit, holding that no dedication of the property to any charitable purpose was made out.

Issues: The main issue was whether there had been a completed dedication of the property for the charitable purpose of free feeding of the poor, and whether the property was liable to answer the respondent's debt.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that while there was no completed dedication of the property during the testator's lifetime, the property was devised under the will to the charity. The court also held that the appellant, as the executor, was obligated to discharge the respondent's debt before carrying out the directions of the will in regard to the charity.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the respondent was entitled to levy execution against the property under the decree obtained by him.

JUDGMENT

Patanjali Sastri, J.

1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the appellant as the managing trustee of. a certain charity known as " M.M. PL. Annadhana Chatram" at Nemathanpatti, Ramnad District, for release of a certain land and building from attachment effected in execution of a decree obtained by the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) against the legal representatives of one M.M. PL. Palaniappa Chetty.

2. Palaniappa Chetty was carrying on banking and money lending business in various places in India and Burma with his headquarters at Nemathanpatti. In 1923 the respondent brought a suit against Palaniappa and others in the District Court of Pyapone in Burma for recovery of possession of certain lands and premises with mesne profits. During the pendency of the suit Palaniappa died in 1925, having made a will dated 2nd June, 1925, whereby he bequeathed the bulk of his separate properties to various charities and appointed his two sons Chokkalingam Chetty, the appellant herein, and Kasi Chetty executors under the will to carry out the directions contained therein. These executors were brought on record as the legal representatives of Palaniappa in the suit. Kasi died subsequently and his widow Alamelu Achi was substituted in his place. After a protracted trial the suit ended in a final decree dated 16th October, 1939, directing the appellant and Alamelu Achi to pay to the plaintiff, the respondent in the present appeal, a sum of Rs. 83,131-13-0 for mesne profits and costs. This decree was transferred to the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Devakottai for execution and among other properties the house property now in question was attached by order of Court dated 31st January, 1941. The appellant objected to the attachment of the suit property on the ground that it was " a choultry for poor feeding " having been dedicated by his father to the said charity. The objection was overruled by order dated 1st April, 1941. The appellant then filed a petition on 9th April, 1941, under Order 21, Rule 58 of the Civil Procedure Code on behalf of "Nemathanpatti Annadhana Chatram" as the managing trustee thereof claiming that the building placed under attachment belonged to the Annadhana Chatram charity started by his father, that he was feeding Brahmins and other persons every day in that building and that he had no other right therein except the right of a trustee. He accordingly prayed that the property should be declared to belong to Nemathanpatti M.M.PL. Annadhana Chatram and released from the attachment. The claim was rejected by order dated 27th July, 1941, and this suit was brought on 20th November, 1941 under Order 21, Rule 63 to establish the right claimed by the appellant as the managing trustee for and on behalf of the charity to the property attached. The trial Court decreed the claim and raised the attachment, but the lower appellate Court reversed the decree and dismissed the suit holding, among other things, that no dedication of the suit property to any charitable purpose was made out.

3. The main question for determination in this second appeal accordingly is whether there has been such a completed dedication of the suit building for the charitable purpose of free feeding of the poor that Palaniappa or his representatives could no longer claim property in it.

4. Before considering the question it will be convenient to state a few facts which form the back ground and as to which there has been no dispute before us. Palaniappa Chetty became divided from his sons and his brothers sons in 1919 and his first wife, the mother of the appellant, died in Karthigai of the Tamil year Dunmathi corresponding to November-December 1921. On the 16th day of her death, the concluding day of the funeral ceremonies, Palaniappa started in honour of her memory the charity of feeding the poor in an old building belonging to him in his native village Nemathanpatti. No fund, however, was set apart as an endowment





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top