SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1945 Supreme(Mad) 179

BELLIE
Venkatachala Pillai – Appellant
Versus
M. R. Rajagopal Naidu – Respondent


ORDER

Bell, J.

1. This revision petition is against a decision in an execution application before the District Munsif of Poonamallee. The matter arose out of a maintenance suit which resulted in a decree dated 19th March 1936. This was modified on 6th July 1938 on appeal. Later, the decree holder assigned it to respondent 1, in the lower Court. He brought the properties to sale in execution and a sale took place on 1st September 1943. Respondent 2 in the lower Court - the petitioner here - bought some of the property in question. On 30th March 1938, some of the same properties had been mortgaged to the petitioner in the lower Court, respondent 1 here. In the lower Court, the mortgagee finding that the decree had been executed and property brought to sale by the assignee-decree-holder had been purchased by a stranger, filed an execution application, the execution application with which we are concerned and succeeded in setting aside the sale on the ground of certain irregularities. The assignee-decree-holder offered no objection because he no doubt knew that the mortgagee-petitioner was prepared to pay the amount of the maintenance installments due under the decree and for which it ha


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top