SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1910 Supreme(Mad) 231

MUNRO, SANKARAN NAIR
Sennayan Chetty – Appellant
Versus
Sinnappan Servai – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The only provision in the partition-deed, Exhibit A, as to the devolution of the trusteeship, is that "after the life-time of the aforesaid Venkataraman Chetti the senior-most member for the time being shall manage the properties endowed." There is no provision for the renunciation of the trusteeship by Venkataraman Chettiar and for the appointment by him of his successor. It does not appear from Exhibit A that this is a case of hereditary trusteeship.

2. The second appeal is dismissed with costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top