SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1931 Supreme(Mad) 306

REILLY
The Madras Central Urban Bank Ltd. and The Madras City Co-operative Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Corporation of Madras – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Reilly, J.

1. These cases refer to two Banks which have been registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, namely," the Madras Central Urban Bank, Limited, and the Madras City Co-operative Bank, Limited, both of which carry on their operations in Madras. The Commissioner of the Corporation of Madras demanded profession tax from these two Banks tinder Section 111 of the Madras City Municipal Act of 1919. Under that section only persons who are not liable to companies tax under Section 110 of the Act are liable to profession tax. Both the Banks objected to the Commissioners demands, at that stage apparently maintaining that they were liable neither to profession tax nor to companies tax. They appealed to the Standing Committee of the Corporation, which rejected their appeals. Then, under Rule 15 of SchIV of the City Municipal Act they appealed to the Court of Small Causes and at that stage contended that, if they were liable to be taxed at all, it was under Section 110 of the Act to companies tax, not to profession tax. The learned Chief judge, who heard those appeals, found that the two Banks were liable to pay companies tax under Section 110 but not profession tax under S






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top