SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1931 Supreme(Mad) 61

MADHAVAN NAIR
Sri Rajah Rao Venkatakumara Mahipathi Surya Rao Bahadur Garu, the Maharaja of Pittapuram – Appellant
Versus
Gokuldoss Goverdhanadoss – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Madhavan Nair, J.

1. These two applications relate to the same subject-matter, that is, a sum of Rs. 6,218-14-3 standing to the credit of C.S. No. 229 of 1924 and representing the income from the mortgaged properties involved in that suit other than Misquith Buildings and Cathedral Gardens. In the one, the receiver is asked to deposit the amount in Court and in the other, that is, Application No. 244 of 1931, a request is made that the same sum may be paid over to the plaintiff in the suit, the Maharaja of Pittapuram, who is the petitioner in both the applications. The Official Assignee of Madras and the plaintiff in C. S. No. 622 of 1923 oppose these applications.

2. The facts necessary for the disposal of these applications may be stated very briefly as follows : One Gokuldoss, manager of a joint Hindu family, trading under the style of Murlidoss Ramdoss & Co., effected on behalf of the firm an equitable mortgage by depositing title-deeds of ten items of properties with the petitioner, the Maharaja of Pittapuram, and borrowed from him a sum of Rs. 3,85,000 in the year 1922. For the recovery of the principal and interets due under this mortgage the Maharaja filed a suit C.S.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top