SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Mad) 181

HORACE OWEN COMPTON BEASLEY, KT.
The National Insurance Company, Limited – Appellant
Versus
Seethammal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Horace Owen Compton Beasley, Kt., C.J.

1. This is an appeal from a judgment of Stone, J. He held that an insurance policy effected with the National Insurance Co., Ltd., which has its head office at 7, Church Lane, Calcutta, on the 7th July, 1919, for Rs. 1,500 was effected in Madras. He has, however, stated no reasons in his judgment for so holding.

2. The point to be considered by us here is, where was this policy of insurance effected? If it was effected in Madras, then a trust has been created in favour of the assureds wife and the policy money has to be paid to the Official Trustee of Madras; and that is by reason of Section 6 of the Married Womens Property Act. If, on the other hand, the policy was effected in Calcutta, it having been effected in 1919, that is to say, before 1923, there is no trust and letters of administration will have to be taken out by the widow of the assured for the purpose of obtaining the policy money.

3. It is contended for the appellants that this policy was effected in Calcutta. A copy of the insurance policy has been put in and it is therein stated that the assured has caused to be delivered at the Head Office of the Company a form of proposa



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top