SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Mad) 288

STONE
P. Venkatachallam, a business concern, by its Receiver Mr. Gompertz – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Corporation of Madras – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Stone, J.

1. This motion is for the issue of a writ of certiorari to the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, commanding him to send forthwith to and before this Court all and singular the orders of the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, dated 1st May, 1933, in the matter of issuing a license to the P. Venkatachallam Condiment Factory with all things touching the same etc. The matter has been very fully and fairly argued before me partly on affidavit evidence and partly on oral evidence, and it is agreed quite properly by Mr. Rajamanikkam on behalf of the Corporation that the point in issue shall be finally disposed of to-day rather than limiting my orders to-day to the issue of a writ which would be returnable for argument.

2. The question that the proceedings raise is one of very considerable importance, in my opinion, to the business community of Madras. It relates to the powers of the Corporation (conferred by the Madras City Municipal Act) to refuse or cancel the license required before certain scheduled trades can be carried on. It was observed by Reilly, J., in Corporation of Madras v. The Madras Electric Tramways, Ltd. (1930) 60 M.L.J. 551 as follows:

Can it be suppo

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top