SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Mad) 323

Srinivasa Ayyar alias Srinivasa Ayyangar – Appellant
Versus
The Board of Commissioners for the Hindu Religious Endowments – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. A decision by the District Judge under Section 84(2) of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act (II of 1927) has been held to be not appealable under a recent Full Bench decision of our High Court in Rajagopala Chettiar v. Hindu Religious Endowments Board, Madras (1933) 66 M.L.J. 43 . This is an appeal against an order refusing to set aside the dismissal of the application under the aforesaid Section 84 for default. According to Order 43, Rule 1, Clause (c), an appeal would lie against such an order, only in a case open to appeal.

2. We therefore hold that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is incompetent and dismiss it with costs. (Two sets.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top