SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Mad) 270

MADHAVAN NAIR
Lakshmi Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada by its Manager R. J. Baker – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Madhavan Nair, J.

1. The plaintiff is the appellant. The question for determination in this appeal is whether the suit out of which this appeal arises was properly instituted by the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff is a widow. In 1906 her husband insured his life for the benefit of his wife for a sum of Rs. 2,000 with the New York Life Insurance Company whose office was situate in Calcutta. The business of the New York Life Insurance Company in India has since been taken over by the defendants, the Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada. The plaintiffs husband obtained a loan of Rs. 600 from the defendants and in 1926 he surrendered his policy receiving a sum of Rs. 700 and odd exercising an option reserved in his favour in the policy. In 1929 the plaintiffs husband died. She now claims to recover the money under the Indian Married Womens Property Act (Act III of 1874) on the ground that under Section 6 of the Act a trust has been created in her favour. In the present suit she asks for a declaration that a trust was created by her deceased husband and that she is the beneficiary thereunder and that the Official Trustee of Madras or such other fit and proper person be appointed to ex












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top