MADHAVAN NAIR
The Indian Bank and The Official Receiver of Madura – Appellant
Versus
Seth Bansiram Jashamal Firm, through its managing partner, Lilaram – Respondent
Madhavan Nair, J.
1. This Appeal has been filed against the decree in O.S. No. 116 of 1927 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Madura.
2. The Indian Bank, Ltd., Madras, is the appellant in this Court. The appellant was not a party to the suit or to the decree passed in it. A preliminary objection to the hearing of the appeal is taken by the respondents that since the appellant was not a party to the suit or decree in the Lower Court, this appeal is incompetent and should be dismissed.
3. The 1st plaintiff in the suit is a moneylender. The 2nd plaintiff is the purchaser of the suit properties from him. The defendant is the Official Receiver of Madura. There are no other parties to the suit.
4. The suit out of which this appeal arises was instituted by the plaintiffs under Order 21, Rule 403, Civil Procedure Code, to declare their title to two items of property and for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from taking possession of them.
5. On the 22nd March, 1923, a hypothecation bond Ex. A was executed in the 1st plaintiffs favour by one Somasundara Nadar, his adult son and five minor sons represented by their father. In September, 1923, the 1st plain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.