SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Mad) 312

WALSH
Rajagopalu Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Kasiviswanathan Chettiar – Respondent


ORDER

Walsh, J.

1. The plaintiff-respondent in this petition filed a suit; against the petitioner to recover a sum of money as commission under the usual Nattukottai Ghetti custom. The petitioner was the respondents agent at Thaiping in the Malay States. The plaint alleged that on 14th December 1929 the petitioner agreed to go out as agent for another term to the said Thaiping, that in respect of the aforesaid commission he agreed to return 750 rings with interest, and that if he broke the contract and defaulted to go out as agent he should return another 725 rings. But the petitioner defaulted to go out as agent. Consequently the suit was laid for the-value of 750 rings with interest. The defendant stated that the breach of the contract was on the plaintiffs side and counter-claimed damages assessed at the difference between the pay which he had to accept under another principal and the pay which he would have-received from the plaintiff. The suit was filed on 26th August 1931 four days before the defendant left for Thaiping which, it is not disputed, is his usual place of residence. The defendant applied to be examined on commission which the lower Court refused. Against this order









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top