SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(Mad) 40

CURGENVEN
Kompalli Chenchuramayya – Appellant
Versus
Dama Venkatasubbayya Chetty – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Curgenven, J.

1. The appeal is by the defendants (except the 7th) against the decree of the Subordinate Judge of Chittoor declaring the plaintiffs title to the plots marked J and P in the plaintiffs plan and directing formal delivery coupled with an injunction restraining the defendants from entering upon the land. There are three contiguous villages, of which Panguru and Jangalapalli are the property of the plaintiff while the third Krishnampalli Agraharam, belongs to the defendants, who are the joint Agraharamdars. These villages have never been surveyed, which adds considerably to the difficulty of locating and identifying any piece of land within them. The plots in dispute are two blocks of forest land, block P being situated according to the plaintiff in Panguru and block J in Jangalapalli, while the defendants assert that they are comprised within the limits of their own village Krishnampalli. Each side has filed a plan in support of its allegations and these plans are considerably at variance; but there is no substantial disagreement as to the general situation of the two blocks, and it will be convenient to refer in discussing the evidence to the plaint plan.

2. Deali


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top