SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(Mad) 184

Syed Mahomed Ghouse – Appellant
Versus
Sayabiran Sahib deceased – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. These four appeals all arise out of the same suit. It related to the right of trusteeship of the durgas of Killai and Nawabpet in Chidambaram taluk and was originally filed by the sixteenth defendant (who is now dead) claiming to have been nominated by the last holder Mohideen Shah who died in 1905. That case was found against by the Subordinate Judge who therefore dismissed the suit. There was an appeal to the High Court A. S. No. 168 of 1910. That appeal was disposed of by Sankaran Nair and Spencer, JJ., in 1914. They agreed with the finding of the lower Court that the plaintiff was not nominated by the last holder but held that the suit need not be dismissed, and that fresh appointment can be made by the Civil Court and they reversed the decree and sent the case back with a direction that all other interested parties should be made parties to the suit. After the case went back, the original plaintiff compromised the matter and did not prosecute the suit any further. Four other persons then became plaintiffs; Of these the first plaintiff was ultimately appointed as Manager of the Killai durga and the second plaintiff was appointed for the durga of Nawabpet by the Subor



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top