SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(Mad) 511

RAMESAM
Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Janab Hajee Muhammad Sadak Khoyee Sahib – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ramesam, J.

1. This matter comes on before us on a reference by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 66(2), Income Tax Act. The facts of the case are these. The assessee, Janab Hajee Mohammad Sadak Khoyee Sahib, carries on money-lending business in Vizianagaram within the jurisdiction of the Income Tax Officer, Vizagapatam circle. In the course of his money-lending business he advanced a sum of Rs. 1,50,000 to the Zamindar of Salur in the Vizagapatam District and obtained a mortgage-deed which is Ex. A dated 8th November 1928. The document directs the amount of consideration to be paid to various creditors of the mortgagor. It provides for payment of interest at one per cent. per mensem at the end of the year. If the interest is not fully discharged at the end of the year, overdue interest will be added to the principal and will carry compound interest. The principal amount was to be paid within ten years. At the end of ten years if the amount is not paid, the mortgagee may file a suit for sale. Possession of 10 out of 21 Jeroyati villages in Schedule A attached to the document was delivered to the mortgagee. The other eleven villages were then in the possession of t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top