SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(Mad) 10

WALSH
Kanneganti Ramamanemma – Appellant
Versus
Kanneganti Basavayya – Respondent


ORDER

Walsh, J.

1. The petitioner in this case is the wife of the defendant. She brought a suit alleging that she got certain lands from her father-in-law under a gift deed, that she has been in possession and enjoyment of that land-till the end of March 1929, and that she had leased out the said land, the last of the registered deeds being Ex. F, a registered kabulrat for ten years dated 5th June 1929. She stated in her plaint that her tenants on 29th June 1929 sent; her a registered postcard Ex. G which-reached the plaintiff on 2nd July 1929 saying that they do not find it suitable to carry on cultivation and gave up possession of the land. They also said in Ex. G that the plaintiff might get the lands cultivated as it pleased her. In para. 5 of the plaint she states:

Then the plaintiff sent her brother Movva Rammayya to Tenali and Guntur on 3rd July 1929 to take the letter and get legal advice. In the meanwhile the defendant wrongfully entered upon the suit land without the plaintiffs knowledge and consent, removed the field ridge, watered the field and unlawfully transplanted the same.

2. In para. 6 she states:

As soon as the plaintiffs brother returned from Tenali he saw the unauth









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top