SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(Mad) 386

BEASLEY, KING
Muthusami Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
K. M. Chinna Muthusami Moopanar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal from an order of the Subordinate Judge of Ramnad at Madura. The petition was one under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, praying for an order directing the respondents to produce a" minor girl with her jewels and deliver her to the petitioner in the presence of the Court and in default for an order that the minor be delivered into the custody of the petitioner. The Subordinate Judge directed the respondents to produce the minor before the Court on December 10, 1933, and deliver her to the petitioner. The question with regard to the jewels was left open.

2. This is a contest between the father of the minor girl and her maternal grandfather and maternal uncle. It seems that the petitioners first wife who was the mother of the minor daughter died and a year after the minor girl was allowed to be taken by her maternal grandfather to his house and to be brought up by him. On behalf of the petitioner, the father of the minor, it is alleged that the respondents, the maternal grandfather and maternal uncle at the minor, have not been maintaining the minor girl in comfort as befitted her status in life, that he demanded her return to him and that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top