SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1937 Supreme(Mad) 183

VARADACHARIAR
Panyam Thirumalappa – Appellant
Versus
Alasyam Ramappa – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Varadachariar, J.

1. This second appeal arises out of a suit for the recovery of the plaintiffs one-third share in certain items of immovable property and for incidental reliefs. It is the plaintiffs case that his deceased brother Yerikalappa, the second defendant and Nettekalappa the father of the first defendant were partners in an Abkari business from 1892 to 1904, that out of the funds of that business they purchased the suit properties, that in 1904, there was a dissolution and settlement of accounts between them evidenced by Ex. A, that under that arrangement provision was made for the discharge of debts and for division of the outstandings and that as regards the immovable properties which had been purchased with the funds of the partnership, the three partners agreed that they should be entitled to the same in equal shares. The plaint adds that for many years after the date of Ex. A, Yerikalappa and after his death the plaintiff as his surviving brother were receiving his one-third share of the income of the suit properties. The plaint prayed for division of the immovable properties thus held in common. The first defendant, who is the principal contesting defendant,








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top