SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1911 Supreme(Mad) 291

BAKEWELL
Thiruvengadathamiah – Appellant
Versus
Mungiah – Respondent


ORDER

1. It has been the practice in the Registrars office to require the parties to pay the stamp duty leviable upon a partition under the Stamp Act. 1899, schedule I, Article 45 before the issue of the final decree in a partition suit, on the ground that the decree is a final order for effecting a partition passed by a Civil Court within the meaning of Section 2 (15) of the Act, which defines an "instrument of partition."

2. The learned vakil for the plaintiff has argued that the duty is not chargeable upon the decree in this case, since it is not a final order within this definition, and that final order means an order made in execution delivering to the parties the shares which have been determined by the decree of the Court.

3. To make an order chirgeabla under the section it must effect an actual division of the property and therefore an order declaring the rights of the parties and directing further proceedings for the ascertainment of the specific portion to be taken by each party, or for the demarcation of a share of immoveabla property by metes and bounds, will not fall within the section. The Courts have sometimes passed such interim orders and directed further proceeding t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top