Abdur Rahman, J.

1. This is a Civil Revision Petition against an order of the Principal Subordinate Judge of Trichinopoly dispaupering the plaintiff, under Order XXXIII, Rule 9, Civil Procedure Code, on the ground of his having entered into an agreement with one Manickatn Pillai with reference to the subject-matter of the suit. The execution of the agreement was admitted, but it was alleged that the agreement was neither in respect of the subject-matter of the suit, nor had any person obtained an interest in such subject-matter. After the agreement was produced by Manickam Piilai, the plaintiff alleged subsequently that the agreement was altered in material particulars after its execution, and that he did not know of such alteration until it was produced in Court. After recording evidence in the proceedings, the learned Subordinate Judge found it as a fact that the agreement was not altered. The petitioner now asked me to interfere with this finding on the ground that it is erroneous. After hearing his Counsels arguments, who led me through the evidence, I and myself in agreement with the finding of the Court below. Even if I had not arrived at the same conclusion, J. would not