SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1937 Supreme(Mad) 256

LEACH, VARADACHARIAR
Pentapati Nageswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Moka Naraynamurthi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Leach, C.J.

1. The question raised by this petition is whether an improperly stamped promissory note can be admitted in evidence to prove acknowledgment of liability in order to save limitation in respect of promissory notes previously executed. The petition arises out of a suit filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Amalapuram. The promissory note was in the following terms:

On account of my necessity this day that is the amount due for principal and interest on the promissory note executed and delivered on June 23, 1929, is Rs. 93-3-0: the amount due on the promissory note executed and delivered on July 6, 1929, is Rs. 92-13-0 and the amount due for principal and interest on the promissory note executed and delivered on February 14, 1931, is Rs. 101. The total is Rs. 287. On demand I promise to pay you or order in one lump sum the (said) principal together with interest thereon at Rs. 1-9-0 (one rupee and nine annas) percent, per mensem, shall get the payment endorsed on this note and take it back. The consideration hereof has been received as aforesaid. This promissory note is executed with consent.

2. On a stamp of the value of one anna was appended the signature o






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top