RALPH BENSON, SUNDARA.AIYAR
Peediangadi Cheriyapurayil Cheeria Imbichi Beebi – Appellant
Versus
Puthiyangadi Cheriyapurayil Syed Ali and Puthiyangadi Cheriyapurayil Syed Ali Hamida alias Kohyanbi Koya Tangal – Respondent
1. The parties to this suit are Muhammadans of Calicut. The plaintiffs claim is to recover a half share of certain claim is to recover a half shar of certain properties together with past profits for a period of 10 years prior to the suit and future profit till delivery. By a karar between the members of the family. Exhibit I, dated the 3rd September, 1893, it was declared that all the propetties comprised in it were dedicated as wakf by a deceased ancestor and managed as wakf property by the senior male member for the time being, the surplus income after defraying the expenses of the members of the wakfs family. The manner in which the administration of the property was carried on and the surplus and dissensions in the family and the object of the karar is stated to be to frame a scheme which would put an end to quarrels amount the members in the future, The karar is stated to be to frame a scheme which would put an end to quarrels amount the members in the future, The karar recites that the properties were indivisible, which they, of course, were as wakf. It then sets outt thte made agreed on for the future management of the properties. Briefly, what was done was this. Ni
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.