IN THE HIGH COURT OF MARAS
Bakewell, J.
B. Tirapayya Minor By Guardian T.
Versus
Mallidi Ramaswami
Decided On : 28 February, 1913
Guardianship - Natural Mother - Payment for Benefit of Minor - Interpretation of 'lawful guardian' under Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1908
Fact of the Case:
The District Munsif found that the natural mother's action in making the payment was for the benefit of the minor and that she was in charge of his person and property at the time.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that in the absence of willing guardians appointed by the minor's adoptive father, the natural mother was the proper person to be entrusted with the minor's interests. The court also held that a person lawfully acting as a guardian, though not legally appointed, can bind the estate for necessary purposes, and such a person is considered a 'lawful guardian' under Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1908 when acting for the benefit of the minor.
Issues: Interpretation of 'lawful guardian' under Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1908, authority of the natural mother as guardian in the absence of appointed guardians
Ratio Decidendi: A person lawfully acting as a guardian, though not legally appointed, can bind the estate for necessary purposes and is considered a 'lawful guardian' under Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1908 when acting for the benefit of the minor.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed with costs.
Bakewell, J.
1. The District Munsif has found that the action of the natural mother of the minor, in making the payment in question, was for the benefit of the minor and that she was in charge of His person and property at the time.
2. The guardians appointed by the with of the minors adoptive father, and all his relations appear to have been unwilling to act as guardians, and in their default, the natural mother of the minor was, I think, the proper person, to be entrusted with his interests. The cases cited show that a person who is lawfully acting as guardian, though not legally appointed for the purpose, can bind his estate for necessary purposes, and I think that such a person is a " lawful guardian within the meaning of Section 21 of the Limitation Act 1908 when acting for the benefit of the minor. The payments made by Suramma therefore save the bar of limitation. The petition is dismissed with costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.