SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1913 Supreme(Mad) 203

ARNOLD WHITE
R. P. Koneti Naicker, And 2 Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Jatu Gopala Aiyar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arnold White, C.J.

1. The main question we have to determine is whether the party who signed the promissory note in question as maker is personally liable thereon. The following is a translation of the note:

12th August 1907 corresponding to 28th Audi Plevanga--"Promissory note executed to you both (1) Gopalaiyar and "(2) Nagasamier, sons of Soothi Seshaiyar, residing in No. 1 Police "Station lane, Madura town, by E. P. Koneti Nayudu Garu, son of "Nanjundappa Nayudu Garu, agent holding power of Attorney from "the Zemindar Dorai Rajah Avergal and residing in Vellikurichi "Village, Mana Madura Taluk, Madura District.

Amount due to you including principal and interest up to date "upon settlement of account of dealings which was standing against " the name of Ranichekkani ammal on cloths &c, having been purchased ere this for the Vellikurichi palace, is Rs. 694-5-0. On " demand, I promise to pay this sum of Rupees six hundred and " ninety four and annas six with interest at Re. per cent, per " mensem from this date either to you or order and shall take this " back with the endorsement of payment thereon.

(Signed) R.P. KONETTI NAYUDU

(in Telugu.)

2. The contention for the Appellant wa


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top