SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1914 Supreme(Mad) 204

TYABJI
The Hindustan Assurance And – Appellant
Versus
Rail Mulraj – Respondent


ORDER

Tyabji, J.

1. This application has been referred to us by Mr. Justice Sankaran Nair sitting in Chambers on the Original Side of the High Court under Rule 177 of Order XV of the Rules of the High Court of Madras. We are therefore sitting as the High Court in its Original Civil Jurisdiction and not in the exercise of the appellate Jurisdiction in appeal from decisions in the exercise of its Original Jurisdiction.

2. The application is that all further proceedings in this suit which has been instituted on the Original Side of this High Court be " indefinitely stayed under Sections 22, 23, 24 and 151 of Act V of 1908". The suit is instituted by a limited liability Company for recovering damages for defamation from the editor, printer and publisher of a newspaper in Lahore.

3. Section 22 of the Civil Procedure Code refers to cases where a suit may be instituted in any one of two or more courts, and is instituted in one of such courts. In such cases an application may be made by any defendant for transfer of the suit to another Court. Section 22 does not provide to which Court the application for transfer has to be made. That matter is provided for in Section 23. The sub-section of Sec











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top