SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1914 Supreme(Mad) 259

Malamal Vittil Krishnan Nair – Appellant
Versus
Kavalappara Moopil Nair – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The District Judge passed an order under Order 41, Rule 5 refusing to stay the execution of a decree passed by the Subordinate Judge against which an appeal is pending before himself. This is an appeal against his order.

2. A preliminary objection is taken that no appeal lies. We think the objection is well founded. Mr. Ramachandra Aiyar contends that the order falls within the purview of Section 47 and is therefore appealable. But that section only applies to orders passed by the court executing the decree. In this case the District Court is not the Court executing the decree. See Ramachandra v. Balmukund (1904) I.L.R. 29 B. 71.

3. We therefore uphold the preliminary objection and dismiss the appeal with costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top