Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MARAS
P. Govindan Nair
Versus
K. Nana Menon
Decided On : 22 September, 1914
The suit is based on the promissory note executed by the deceased Karnavan of the defendants tarwad, and not on the original cause of action. The decision in Krishna Aiyar v. Krishnaswami Aiyar (1900) I.L.R. 23 M. 597 therefore does not apply and there is no ground for making the tarwad property in the hands of the defendant liable in the present suit. The petition is dismissed with costs.
1. The suit has been treated as based on the promissory note executed by the deceased Karnavan of the defendants tarwad, and not on the original cause of action. The decision in Krishna Aiyar v. Krishnaswami Aiyar (1900) I.L.R. 23 M. 597 therefore does not apply and there is no ground for making the tarwad property in the hands of the defendant liable in the present suit.
2. The petition is dismissed with costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
