SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1934 Supreme(Mad) 436

VENKATASUBBA RAO
Sree Raja Malraju Venkata Narasimha Rao Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman, Municipal Council – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Venkatasubba Rao, J.

1. The question that arises is, whether the dividends received by a person from a company can be treated as a source of income for the purpose of levying the profession-tax under the Madras District Municipalities Act. For the petitioner, it is contended that to levy a tax on a share-holder would amount to " taxing twice over", the company having been already assessed in respect of its profits which in effect belong to the share-holders. The Income Tax Acts, as is pointed out in Purshottamdas Harkisondas v. The Central India Spinning, Weaving and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. I.L.R.(1917) 42 Bom. 579 proceed upon the footing that the entire profits are subject to the common burden of Income Tax, which in truth is paid by the share-holders, although the payment is made by the company. That this is the true view, appears also from the following passage in the judgment of Romer, L.J.:

If such a company as we have to deal with pays Income Tax on its profits, the Income Tax, as has been pointed out, is payable out of the profits, and is part of the profits; and if the profits, after deducting the Income Tax, have subsequently to be distributed amongst the members of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top