RAJAMANNAR, VENKATARAMA AYYAR
V. Peddarangaswami – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madras, represented by the Collector of Bellary – Respondent
RAJAMANNAR, C.J. :- These two appeals arise out of two suits tried together along with another suit (which, however, has not come up in appeal) and disposed of by a common judgment by the learned District Judge of Bellary. The appellant is the plaintiff in both the suits. For a determination of the questions which arise in these appeals it is necessary to relate the events which led up to the suits. It is sufficient to commence the narration with the grant of a prospecting licence to the appellant on 28-5-1941 (Ex.A.1) which conferred on him the sole right, subject to the conditions contained in the licence, to mine, bore, dig and search for iron and work and carry away red oxide of iron within an area of 76 acres being a portion of S.No.326 of Janikunta village in Bellary district. The licence was for a term of one year commencing from 28-5-1941. The contesting respondent in the appeals, one Vishnu Nimbkar, obtained a similar prospecting licence for red oxide on 11-8-1941 (Ex.B.1) in respect of S.No.3 in the village of Thumti in the same district measuring 288 acres. This survey number was adjacent to the area in respect of which the appellant had been granted a licence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.