SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Mad) 253

BASHEER AHMED SAYEED
Ambal Bagyam – Appellant
Versus
Ramayya Padayachi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.S. Kuppuswami Iyer, for Appellant; R. Rangachari, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGMENT : -This appeal is by the wife whose marriage with her husband has been dissolved by an order of the learned Subordinate Judge of Mayuram in an application filed by the husband for divorce under Act 6 of 1949, S.5(1)(b).

2. Section 5(1) (b) is in the following terms:

"(1) Either party to a marriage solemnised before or after the commencement of this Act who has completed eighteen years of age may present a petition to the (concerned court) within the limits of whose jurisdiction the marriage was solemnised......

(b) if the wife, is a concubine of any other man or is leading the life of a prostitute."

In this case the petitioner-respondent did not allege that the appellant was leading a life of a prostitute. He confined His petition for divorce to the ground that his wife, the appellant here, is a concubine of another man, namely, one Pavadai Chettiar. It goes beyond saying that in a case where the petitioner applies to the Court for a divorce on any one of the grounds contained in S.5 of Act 6 of 1949, the burden lies heavily on the petitioner who seeks to establish the case on the grounds on which he seeks the dissolution of his marriage tie with his wife. The questio





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top